Posts: 3,214
Threads: 215
Joined: Jun 2011
VASCAR2 Wrote:Wikipedia list the case length for the 6.5 Grendel Case as 38.7 mm so instead of calling it 6.5x39 I think PPU is just using a more descriptive name without calling it 6.5 Grendel. Whether PPU has upped the pressure for the Serb military is yet to be disclosed. All the previous information indicated the performance was very similar to the 6.5 Grendel.
Possible, but I quote the article:Serbian soldier with M17 in DMR configuration (source)Interestingly, it appears that the rifle is now chambered in a proprietary cartridge, 6.5×38.7mm, rather than the original 6.5×39 mm Grendel cartridge. The new round has been developed by Serbias Prvi Partizan, an ammunition manufacturer. The new round reportedly has better ballistic characteristics, with a flatter trajectory and more kinetic energy on target out to 800m, according to the Serbian Ministry of Defense.
It could possibly be the same as the 300 Whisper and 300 BO, but it could also have a much higher pressure value unsuitable for AR Grendel platforms.
Posts: 313
Threads: 13
Joined: Jun 2019
It would not surprise me if they redesigned the case to allow higher pressures. They might have monkeyed with the taper and overall length as well.
Bill Alexander had said that the Grendel was designed around the existing AR15's bolt size and magazine well. If I recall correctly, he said that the max design pressure for the case was 58,000 psi. If the case were designed for a significantly higher pressure, the walls and base would need to be thicker, reducing case capacity and increasing material cost.
I don't know what the guts of the M17 look like, but it would not surprise me if it could handle longer cartridges and/or higher pressures.
Posts: 6,193
Threads: 170
Joined: Mar 2015
I bet all they did was cut the neck down just a hair. So they could call it something diffrent when they jacked the pressure up to increase nothing basicly.
Posts: 4,033
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2011
6.5 Grendel - SAAMI dimensions
Case Length: 1.52 in / 38.6 mm
Posts: 313
Threads: 13
Joined: Jun 2019
08-02-2019, 12:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-02-2019, 12:45 AM by Fess.)
OOPS. I just realize that I misread the article. I am now pretty sure that they were comparing the new 6.5 round to their old one, the 7.62x39, not to the Grendel. Duh on my part. No wonder they said: "The new round reportedly has better ballistic characteristics, with a flatter trajectory and more kinetic energy on target out to 800m, according to the Serbian Ministry of Defense." Even a downloaded Grendel does that.
Posts: 4,033
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2011
"The 6.5×38.7 mm round, developed by Serbia's Prvi Partizan, leverages work on the company's 6.5×39 mm Grendel cartridge, but it has been optimised to be fired from automatic and semi-automatic weapons."
https://www.janes.com/article/90088/zast...ault-rifle
Posts: 313
Threads: 13
Joined: Jun 2019
I recall that when the Grendel was first introduced, there was concern about the relatively small amount of cartridge taper and the steep shoulder angle. It will be interesting to see what is meant by "optimised to be fired from automatic and semi-automatic weapons".
Posts: 6,206
Threads: 50
Joined: Mar 2011
Stan do you think the case taper on the 6.5 Grendel needs optimized to use disintegrating belt for machine guns. I can’t remember if anyone ever designed a disintegrating belt for the 6.5 Grendel. What ever Serbia adopts I don’t think it will have much effect on the 6.5 Grendel other than maybe slow PPU selling 6.5 Grendel ammo in the USA.
Posts: 4,033
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2011
I doubt that 6.5 Grendel case taper would be an issue. It isn't significantly different from 7.62 NATO case taper, which works just fine in disintegrating links.
Years ago some Horde members posted artist's concepts of metallic links designed to fit 6.5 Grendel case dimensions, but none have ever been prototyped.
Posts: 1,567
Threads: 8
Joined: Sep 2012
Since they came up with an "almost?" Grendel case but with the wrong primer pocket, perhaps they are just creating a market for what they already had.
Posts: 109
Threads: 4
Joined: Jun 2014
just_john Wrote:Since they came up with an "almost?" Grendel case but with the wrong primer pocket, perhaps they are just creating a market for what they already had.
Could be, but I'm thinking they wanted a different neck/throat to optimize their choice of bullet....Primer pockets don't "usually" force a name change...think of all the 308 small primer pocket brass out there.
Posts: 636
Threads: 149
Joined: Apr 2017
My guess is the shoulder pushed out just enough not to chamber in a Grendel and the pressure jacked up to what the action can take.
Posts: 4,033
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2011
hill37 Wrote:My guess is the shoulder pushed out just enough not to chamber in a Grendel and the pressure jacked up to what the action can take. So you're thinking something similar to the 6.5 Grendel Max?
_____________________ 7.62x39 ___________ 6.5x39 __________ 6.5 Grendel ________ 6.5 Grendel Max
Posts: 636
Threads: 149
Joined: Apr 2017
That's where I'd start. Then do what it took to get it to feed.
Posts: 4,033
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2011
Quote:In the second quarter of 2020, the Serbian army adopted the new modular M19 automatic rifle. Feature weapons is not just replacement of barrels of different lengths, but also bicaliber performance. The weapon can be transformed for the use of two ammunition. The old widely known Soviet intermediate cartridge 7,62x39 (model 1943), which is still one of the most common on the planet, and the new 6,5x39 mm Serbian cartridge, built on the basis of 6,5 mm Grendel ammunition.
https://en.topwar.ru/177059-serbija-otho...a-762.html
Posts: 636
Threads: 149
Joined: Apr 2017
It seems Trolls and Drifting off topic is a universal forum problem.
Posts: 4,033
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2011
hill37 Wrote:It seems Trolls and Drifting off topic is a universal forum problem. :confused:
Posts: 3,340
Threads: 46
Joined: Mar 2011
hill37 Wrote:It seems Trolls and Drifting off topic is a universal forum problem.
h37:
Ditto with Stan.
What are you talking about?
Of all the Threads, this one has stayed on topic way better than most.
LR55
Posts: 636
Threads: 149
Joined: Apr 2017
I'm sorry. I wasn't talking about Stan. I should have said I was talking about The comments section of the article. I apologize to Stan for my mistake.
Posts: 4,033
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2011
No apology necessary. I was puzzled, not offended. Thanks for clarifying.
|