05-09-2019, 05:39 PM
CaptnC Wrote:A5B,
"The muzzle velocity you posted is cooked data for a very heavy bullet. I will tell you right now I get average 2278 fps with hornady black and 2307 average with my scenar handloads in my xcaliber 12 inch barrel."
Damn...you got me...the cooked data of a heavy bullet!
Yes sir! 107gr HPBT. SMK is a monster of a heavy! LOL
I did run it on 2200fps because I have seen that posted several times by the 12.5" gang around here.
Yep, you got me cooking the data with a monster of a heavy bullet.
I wish you could up load pictures in a decent size here. I would have done that just to show what data I did use. I would have also took a screen shot of the guys post on AR 15 web site. He also claimed to have used a 3 or 4 power optic in his post. He has posted a picture of his rifle here. I complimented on how nice of a rifle he had. I also skipped over making comments about the shot. He damn sure could easily be a better shot than me. I'd bet money most guys on the Long Range Forum are.
If my data is any where close...331 feet is 100+yds of drop, so to keep the target in the scope you couldn't crank the scope up too much or you would loose the target.
Take your daily dose of prozac and relax! You get too worked up over nothing. This is supposed to be fun and educational.
Your last post doesn't look like your having much fun!
No no so now irs 2200 fps, didn't you say it was 1000 something fps the first time?
I find it funny you can't keep your velocity figures straight. I get over 2200 fps with factory hornady and just over 2300 fps average with my scenar 123 grain handloads.
So witch is it 1000 something or 2200 something fps. Your crawfishing now on your numbers.
The fact of the matter is your wrong and that's ok, you don't have to get it, want it or use it. But don't think for one second your not going to get challenge when you post false facts and false data. Of that you can be sure you will get fired back on for.
Since you deem short barrel grendels so useless, why are you in a short barrel thread then? Why do you feel you have too try and convince anyone of your view of short barreled grendels is correct? If you don't want it, simple see yourself to the door and let others discuss what we want and like.
But then again since short barreled rifles are of such lil use why do you have a thread about useing a turd of a round from a short barreled suppressor fitted op rod driven rifle?
You do want that don't you a turd 7.62x39 round from a short barrel? That's what you have a thread going about?
But yet you seem to think and want everyone else to feel the same as you that short barreled grendels aren't worth it. But at the same time the grendel beats the 7.62x39 in any barrel length. Hmmmm kind of sounds strange your ok with a turd of round in short barrels but you feel a much better round has too have longer barrels.
Hmmmmmmmmm very strange.
But that's enough of me ranting and rubbing my skin off everyone can see your just being a troll about this subject. And there is no more use in waiting effort and time too try and get you to understand your free too not post in such threads.
As always I'm willing to discuss anything with anyone and no personal wrong feelings towards you at all your just wrong on all accounts about said subject and yes you did cook your velocity data you posted above.
As always have a wonderful and blessed day.