02-14-2012, 10:05 PM
According to this link, it is not a barrel burner.
http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011...efinition/
http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011...efinition/
|
6,5 Grendel a barrel burner? No
|
|
02-14-2012, 10:05 PM
According to this link, it is not a barrel burner.
http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011...efinition/
02-14-2012, 10:16 PM
That is a very interesting "quick read" article. I wonder if the conclusions are valid? I suspect the 6.5 grendel is not a barrel burner but I suspect that due to the fact velocities are quite a bit lower & powder charges quite a bit less than say a .260. If this graph has any validity, it could be very useful to anyone considering or comparing a particular caliber or calibers.
Thanks for posting that link! MLM
02-14-2012, 10:29 PM
Define "barrel burner"? My definition is a cartridge which shows significant degradation in accuracy at less than 2000 rounds. My WSM 7mm, for instance, qualifies.
But the Grendel? Not even close! I went almost 6000 rounds before I saw the Grendel drop off in accuracy, and it was still sub MOA at that point. I just couldn't shoot .25 MOA groups with it anymore. It's a relatively low pressure round, so that helps, too. You want to see a really low number, look at the Beowulf! It's index is like 178!
You seek escape from pain. We seek the achievement of happiness. You exist for the sake of avoiding punishment. We exist for the sake of earning rewards. Threats will not make us function; fear is not our incentive. It is not death that we wish to avoid, but life that we wish to live. - John Galt
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|