Posts: 3,654
Threads: 17
Joined: Aug 2013
05-09-2014, 05:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-09-2014, 05:30 AM by Klem.)
Video footage from the annual Knob Creek shoot offered as proof of US supremacy of the Mad Minute? Are you for real?
Are you honestly trying to suggest that the firepower of your Vietnam dumps never happened on the WW1 or WW2 battlefield's? If the USA didn't invent it they did it better...Is that now the debate? Or are we still on the origins of the 'Mad Minute'? Either way...Knob Creek...Really?
Here's footage of your mates the Russians. Probably a little more firepower than Knob Creek, or even a hilltop in Vietnam. But before we get into a measuring contest between the USA and the rest of the world let's not forget the origins of the Mad Minute, and all it represents... the British, and the SMLE303.
[video=youtube;_xHcpgaPuPQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xHcpgaPuPQ[/video]
Posts: 4,033
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2011
1. As I stated in my previous post, the Knob Creek shoot was only intended to give a rough idea of a Vietnam War tank company mad minute, not to "prove" anything. Have you always had such poor English comprehension?
2. I've never heard of WWI or WWII instances of shooting up large quantities of ammo just to prevent too much ammo from accumulating. If there was a supply problem, it was more often too little ammo on hand, rather than too much.
3. You're the only person trying to make a debate on this matter.
4. The discussion was originally about the US use of "mad minute" firing, not the historical origin of the term.
5. The Russians are not my mates.
Posts: 713
Threads: 42
Joined: Feb 2014
They (NOAA) also map the ocean floors. This is a live link, if you can read side scan and bottom scan this is pretty cool. The last time I knew guns are not allowed on these vessels. BANG BANG!!
http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/okeanos/me...am_04.html
Posts: 3,340
Threads: 46
Joined: Mar 2011
Guys:
The article is primed to be debunked. Anyone who has dealt with ammunition planning, forecasting, and storage knows it is a lie. Also, the military would not just destroy billions of dollars of useful Class V. Not too many years ago we were still drawing and using various types of .50 cal ammunition from the mid to late 1950's. If the ammunition has been tested and found safe to use, it will be stored until someone who has an authorization for that DODIC requests it and uses it.
The DoD will destroy items that have been found to have degraded to the point where they are dangerous to use. Much of this stuff is probably obsolete ordinance that we didn't sell to another country.
I think this article is 95% a lie and 5% half truth.
LR1955
Posts: 121
Threads: 10
Joined: Aug 2013
cory Wrote:Why does the NOAA need to be enforcing any laws!!! Let the coast guards enforce all laws off of our coast. Far to many bureaucracies have been given the power to enforce some law as they see fit.
The fourth branch of government has granted them the power to not only enforce laws but to create them. It is known as the administrative branch, it is entirely unconstitutional but it exists none the less.
quis posuit in mea ocreis bologna!
Posts: 3,340
Threads: 46
Joined: Mar 2011
Guys:
Destruction of Class V has has nothing to do with arguing over who invented the 'Mad Minute', tactics used in Vietnam, NOAA, cooking shrimp, or someones political opinions.
Stay on topic or this thread will be locked.
LR1955
Posts: 4,033
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2011
LR1955 Wrote:Destruction of Class V has has nothing to do with arguing over who invented the 'Mad Minute', tactics used in Vietnam, NOAA, cooking shrimp...
What, Class V isn't food? I thought the "V" is for vittles...
Posts: 3,340
Threads: 46
Joined: Mar 2011
I kid you not, she didn't even have a side arm nor a rifle doing that dangerous job, imagine that?? BAMG BAMG!!
