Posts: 337
Threads: 17
Joined: May 2018
I agree, but 15 or so years ago we did specify the lower being a pistol. So we could go either way with build.
The Dems get in office they will tighten their grip on us with these laws!
Posts: 52
Threads: 6
Joined: Apr 2019
In the people's republic of Kalifornia, any lower coming into the state is registered as a rifle. You cannot convert them legally into a pistol. It really sucks living here.
Posts: 60
Threads: 9
Joined: Mar 2013
18" medium contour barrel. Ultralight is too light. The gun will be easy to carry and swing, will be well balanced, and the hogs will hate you for it.
Posts: 67
Threads: 4
Joined: Dec 2018
CaptnC Wrote:The 24" will most likely never make it to the deer stand, it's going to be a range rifle.
Then what was all that arguing about weight and having balls a few pages back?
CaptnC Wrote:I bet you have a pair and could easily carry all the extra weight 4 more inches of barrel weighs!
I know I have a pair, so I can easily handle all that extra weight some people have issue with!
You're saying "MAN UP! Carry that unnecessarily long and heavy rifle through the brush/woods" but then say you won't carry your 24" grendel (one of your heaviest rifles) into the woods/brush and that it is only for the range. Obviously weight is an issue. Why else would you leave a gun with one of the best rounds, with the best ballistics and range you can get out of it at home? There is a disconnect with you somewhere.
Posts: 37
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2015
My favorite barrel length is what gets you legally to 16. My pinned and welded rifles are about my favorite. Best balance of length and ballistics
Posts: 8
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2019
Jeepster18_88 Wrote:As you can see from the previous comments, they vary and there are a lot of my way is the only way opinions on this forum, regardless of the subject. I'll throw my opinion out there but take it as just that because everyone else has made very valid points for their personal preference.
I like the feel and balance of a 16-18" barrel. Anything longer adds velocity but it also adds weight and hog hunting for me means a lot of walking so I prefer a little less weight. I also get into thick brush where I am literally feet away from very aggressive hogs and the longer barrel is more difficult to move quickly on a charging boar due to catching on vines and limbs. I also hunt from blinds sometimes and the longer barrels are more difficult to move around without bumping something. There's many reasons not to go overboard with barrel length IMO.
Going to the opposite end of the spectrum, there are many reasons not to go to the extreme on the short side. First, I don't use hearing protection when I hunt because I can be dangerously close and need every advantage I can get to helping my awareness of what's around me. The short barrels are incredibly loud and I never know that only a few inches of barrel could increase the blast and concussion until I shot one of the AR pistols. It only took one shot from one to let me know that I didn't like them. As others pointed out, you lose velocity and that is THE most important part of individual bullet performance. There's high BC bullets that help there, but that in itself is limiting options. Hunting from a blind, especially a box stand, the shorter barrels are closer under the roof and that magnifies the sound too. Obviously, adding a can to this would change things and if you go suppressed, it's a viable option for you. It literally takes away every issue that I have with the exception of velocity.
I think 16-18" is a better option for hunters like myself for the weight reduction, noise reduction, and added velocity without becoming heavy and cumbersome. If a can was added to this, it would obviously change that.
I find a lot of opinions on here interesting, and there's a lot of lurkers that don't comment much but really have good information if you can get them to share. I don't think like a lot of people here do and that's ok. Most want maximum velocity which means slow powder, I don't. I don't want added muzzle blast and flash to get a few fps more or single digit SD. It's not necessary for less than 300 shots. You won't find many people that would even consider fast powders as an option.
I probably have an unpopular opinion on bullet energy too and I mention this because someone has compared it to a 44 mag energy. This measurement imo is thrown around way to broadly and 1200lbs of energy out of a 223 doesn't perform like 1200lbs out of a 7.62x39. There's absolutely no comparison in performance on game tissue. To further demonstrate, compare a 22 hornet with a 45 Colt. The Hornet shoots flatter and faster, but the weaker 45 Colt will kill game much bigger than it's energy number suggests. IMO, it's a valid measurement but it's often used in the wrong context and causes misleading information. Game laws and recommendations are based on the number frequently but it doesn't really make sense across different calibers.
I started off using a 5.56 AR and was really disappointed with the performance. I moved to a 7.62x39 and completely fell in love with the AR and I prefer to use it when deer and hog hunting over every gun that I own. For everything under 200 yards, nothing I have kills them any better. I bought the Grendel to stretch that performance out to 300 yards without adding weight or recoil because I still need the fast follow up shots and quick handling. In my limited experience with the Grendel, it's more difficult in finding cheap accurate barrels, cheap accurate ammo, and solid "one size fits all" loads. But I have no doubt that it'll do exactly what I want it to do once everything comes together. I have already bought my second one and am currently shopping around for the parts for number 3. Welcome to the addiction.
So much to like in this post but Ill adress what really caught my eye.
Going to the opposite end of the spectrum, there are many reasons not to go to the extreme on the short side. First, I don't use hearing protection when I hunt because I can be dangerously close and need every advantage I can get to helping my awareness of what's around me. The short barrels are incredibly loud and I never know that only a few inches of barrel could increase the blast and concussion until I shot one of the AR pistols. It only took one shot from one to let me know that I didn't like them.
First had never hunted until recently with any ear pro either. I have severe tinnitus in both ears, as in my ears ring constantly. In the last several years companies like Walker have made great strides in quality, affordable electronic ear pro that not only reduces the blast, but amplifies ambient sound before it. Id highly recommend anyone check them out. Also since were talking about hunting with an AR you should keep in mind that muzzle devices COULD have a much more profound effect on blast and concussion to the ear than barrel length. As an example my buddy bought a new Ruger AR in 5.56 last year to hunt prairie dogs and coyotes with. I cant remember the model number but it is a fine rifle, 18 barrel and shooting side by side with my 11 1/2 BCM with a birdcage Fh his rifle had twice the blast as mine. It amazes me they put that obnoxious brake on a 5.56. My buddy screwed on a thread protector and ordered a flash hider as soon as we got back to town.
Posts: 8
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2019
BTW this whole thread has been very informative and is the reason I joined the forum. I have several ARs but am just now beginning to explore the wonderful world of the 6.5 in one. I have an 18” AA Hunter ordered as well as a 12” PSA upper I’ll put on one of my pistol lowers. Heck I might even hunt my black bear this year with them.
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
GunsAreFun Wrote:I just settled on a 12 pistol for alternative method season in Missouri. If youre shooting 100 yards or less, I dont know that it matters much so Id go shorter. Of course youre stuck at 16 or 14.5 with a pinned muzzle break unless you want to SBR or run in pistol configuration.
You can't go with a 12 inch in mo for 2020. Must be under 26 inches now,
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2019
GunsAreFun Wrote:No, Missouri does not have any special regulations. Anything considered a pistol by federal law is considered a pistol by the state and department of conservation.
They will have for 2020 year. No barrel over 26 inches and overall length has to be under 26 inches
Steve