Posts: 23
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2018
I have a question for the guys who are zeroing at super-close distances like 25 yards. Do your scopes have parallax adjustments that come down that far? Because when I aim at 25 yards, everything is blurry and there's no way I'm getting a scientific measurement. My scope's lowest parallax setting is 50.
Posts: 6,193
Threads: 170
Joined: Mar 2015
Well my vortex parallax goes down to 30 yards but with the 16 inch I'm useing a red dot for the time being until I build my 12 inch then I will put the red dot on it and put anouther vortex on the 16 inch.
Some scopes you can adjust the parallax down to 25 yards.
Hope this helps sir.
Posts: 1,613
Threads: 24
Joined: Sep 2014
We are looking at a difference in impact of 4 at 200 yards. Doing the math tells us that this 4 of difference is just one-eighth (1/8) of an inch at 25 yards.
Better to sight in at the longer range if one has access to the longer range.
shootersnotes.com
"To those who have fought and almost died for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
-- Author Unknown
"If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished!" -- Milton Berle
Posts: 2,737
Threads: 44
Joined: Aug 2013
JASmith Wrote:We are looking at a difference in impact of 4” at 200 yards. Doing the math tells us that this 4” of difference is just one-eighth (1/8) of an inch at 25 yards.
Better to sight in at the longer range if one has access to the longer range.
Excellent point. Zero for 200, be done with it. With a red dot, what more do you need?
If it's true that we are here to help others, then what exactly are the others here for?
Posts: 6,193
Threads: 170
Joined: Mar 2015
NugginFutz Wrote:Excellent point. Zero for 200, be done with it. With a red dot, what more do you need?
I can't see the target good enough with my eyes to zero in with the red dot at 200.
So I zeroed at 50 where I can see the lil 6.5mm holes in the paper target and know the direction to adjust to get zero.
Now that irs zeroed next time I get to the range I can bag it up and see what the real world drop is at 200 with the red dot and 100 grain NBT.
Trying to zero at 200 with the red dot for me would be a waist of time,money and ammo.
Posts: 2,737
Threads: 44
Joined: Aug 2013
True, that, A5B, but it’s also an opportunity to make friends with someone who either owns a decent spotting scope or can use yours to help call your shots. Either way, you have a shooting buddy.
i know, because my dominant eye has a detached vitreous, and I face similar challenges.
If it's true that we are here to help others, then what exactly are the others here for?
Posts: 6,193
Threads: 170
Joined: Mar 2015
NugginFutz Wrote:True, that, A5B, but it’s also an opportunity to make friends with someone who either owns a decent spotting scope or can use yours to help call your shots. Either way, you have a shooting buddy.
i know, because my dominant eye has a detached vitreous, and I face similar challenges. 
Yea I need too but not many folks around where i live interested in shooting groups are learning to make first round hits at more then 200 yards.
But they sure quick to buy a larger more powerful caliber rifle when they miss are loss a deer lmao.
They like the 5 in the pie sight in method in Sabine parish lmao
Posts: 1,973
Threads: 28
Joined: Mar 2017
LongPoke Wrote:I have a question for the guys who are zeroing at super-close distances like 25 yards. Do your scopes have parallax adjustments that come down that far? Because when I aim at 25 yards, everything is blurry and there's no way I'm getting a scientific measurement. My scope's lowest parallax setting is 50.
My scope parallax goes below 10m.
http://blog.swfa.com/what-exactly-is-par...c5026.html
Posts: 570
Threads: 37
Joined: Mar 2018
09-13-2018, 06:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-13-2018, 06:50 PM by imaguy3.)
JASmith Wrote:We are looking at a difference in impact of 4” at 200 yards. Doing the math tells us that this 4” of difference is just one-eighth (1/8) of an inch at 25 yards.
Better to sight in at the longer range if one has access to the longer range.
I have looked at this a bunch and maybe I'm missing something, but I think you're math is off.
4" at 200 is 2" at 100
2" at 100 is 1" at 50
1" at 50 is 1/2" at 25.
Posts: 682
Threads: 56
Joined: Dec 2016
Cool pic for 5.56 zeros-
I would like to see one done with 123gr 6.5G....
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. ― George Orwell
Posts: 1,613
Threads: 24
Joined: Sep 2014
imaguy3 Wrote:I have looked at this a bunch and maybe I'm missing something, but I think you're math is off.
4" at 200 is 2" at 100
2" at 100 is 1" at 50
1" at 50 is 1/2" at 25. Ya got me!
The error shows up eight times larger when going from 25 to 200 yards.
Nonetheless, the magnification factor is a clear indication that one needs to sight-in at the longest range practicable. This fuzzes over small differences in muzzle velocity, sighting error, and so on, making the potential miss distance less at intermediate ranges.
shootersnotes.com
"To those who have fought and almost died for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
-- Author Unknown
"If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished!" -- Milton Berle
Posts: 6,193
Threads: 170
Joined: Mar 2015
From what the sterlok app gave me, reddot sighted in at 50 gives me a 2 inch hold over at 200, with the PF loaded 100 grain nbt ammo.
Will test it next time I get to the range.
For the ranges I will use the reddot to hunt and defend myself and home the 500 yard sight in will work perfectly
Posts: 6,193
Threads: 170
Joined: Mar 2015
mdewitt71 Wrote:Cool pic for 5.56 zeros-
![[Image: m193---16-barrel.jpg]](http://arma-dynamics.com/images/m193---16-barrel.jpg)
I would like to see one done with 123gr 6.5G....
I can get very close to that with my 16 inch AA barrel and my 85 grain trex handloads.
|