Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are Gun Owners Being Punished In Your State
#1
400% Increase for Connecticut Gun Permit Fees. California's usual antics. New Mexico bill requiring background checks for any type of firearm transfer.
It seems as though the blue states that voted for Hillary Clinton have set their sights on gun owners.
Are there any more examples of these revenge tactics in your state. It would be interesting to see if only the losers have adopted these methods of getting even with all you evil doers.

Dave
Never walk away from home ahead of your axe and sword. You can't feel a battle in your bones or foresee a fight. -The Havamal
Reply
#2
meh, im in md
they want to make long gun transfers, including loaning one, illegal

just hoping our governor vetos it

but his last veto, for a tax increase, was overridden

no hope until the dems are gone
Reply
#3
Virginia is A-OK for now
Reply
#4
Yes indeed mine is... Don't let it happen to you! Fight for your rights! They are worth fighting for. Seattle has WAY to much power and sway in our state. Jay inslee, ed Murray, and state, AG bob or rob furgesson the one recently made famous for usurping presidential authority. They're like the Nazi youth camp counselors.
They passed i-594 that ONLY punisbes law abiding citizens and now it's basically illegal to loan a friend or family member a firearm. Everyone hates it. Legal gun owners are getting bitter. And personally I'm starting to think about moving. Kinda like Idaho personally...
They have stated they are openly trying to model their laws after Californias. I'll definitely be moving if that happens.
Reply
#5
Democrats hold the governorship and both houses of the Oregon legislature. Once they get done dealing with the $1.8 billion budget shortfall, I'm expecting them to attempt a 10 round magazine limit this year.
Paul Peloquin

Did government credibility die of Covid or with Covid?
Reply
#6
Every time that California does something to violate our Second Amendment the liberals here in Washington, Seattle and Olympia think that they have to one up them.
The Profit Joseph Sith Wrote:Yes indeed mine is... Don't let it happen to you! Fight for your rights! They are worth fighting for. Seattle has WAY to much power and sway in our state. Jay inslee, ed Murray, and state, AG bob or rob furgesson the one recently made famous for usurping presidential authority. They're like the Nazi youth camp counselors.
They passed i-594 that ONLY punisbes law abiding citizens and now it's basically illegal to loan a friend or family member a firearm. Everyone hates it. Legal gun owners are getting bitter. And personally I'm starting to think about moving. Kinda like Idaho personally...
They have stated they are openly trying to model their laws after Californias. I'll definitely be moving if that happens.
Reply
#7
In my town the city tried to ban private sales between individuals without first going through a dealer. Our State Attorney General deemed it unconstitutional with state law and shut it down. This town voted for Hillary of course.
Reply
#8
I feel for y'all having to live behind enemy lines like that, but I sure am glad I live in louisiana our gun laws rock when compared to yalls.
Reply
#9
Not here. My reps are supporting HPA.
NRA Basic, Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, RSO

CCW, CQM, DM, Long Range Rifle Instructor

6.5 Grendel Reloading Handbooks & chamber brushes can be found here:

www.AR15buildbox.com
Reply
#10
montana Wrote:In my town the city tried to ban private sales between individuals without first going through a dealer. Our State Attorney General deemed it unconstitutional with state law and shut it down. This town voted for Hillary of course.

Not so lucky here in Oregon. If fact, I can no longer LOAN a gun to friends since this constitutes 'delivering' a firearm without a background check. Of course, then they selectively enforce the law, not prosecuting those who "think right" on guns.
http://www.guns.com/2016/09/16/oregon-ar...rosecuted/
Paul Peloquin

Did government credibility die of Covid or with Covid?
Reply
#11
We are all too familiar with NY's unSAFE-ACT. Funny thing is, for the great majority, it has made little difference. Sure, ammo is harder to order online because the state gestapo will intimidate out of state sellers with inuendo and mis-information. Private transfer has continued and will continue. I have seen more people acquire "assault weapons" since before the law was changed.

Most of my friends are un-inidicted felons.
Reply
#12
New Jersey....where do I begin...?
Reply
#13
davidj Wrote:400% Increase for Connecticut Gun Permit Fees. California's usual antics. New Mexico bill requiring background checks for any type of firearm transfer.
It seems as though the blue states that voted for Hillary Clinton have set their sights on gun owners.
Are there any more examples of these revenge tactics in your state. It would be interesting to see if only the losers have adopted these methods of getting even with all you evil doers.
I'd hardly call it "revenge tactics," Dave. It's not as if this is a sudden change. The states you refer to have been passing anti-gun laws since long before the 2016 election.
Reply
#14
biodsl Wrote:Not so lucky here in Oregon. If fact, I can no longer LOAN a gun to friends since this constitutes 'delivering' a firearm without a background check. Of course, then they selectively enforce the law, not prosecuting those who "think right" on guns.
http://www.guns.com/2016/09/16/oregon-ar...rosecuted/
How do you figure it's selective enforcement? The article says the case was dropped due to lack of evidence that the law had been violated.
Quote:“None of the witnesses nor documentary evidence obtained by Oregon State Police prove that an actual ‘transfer’ occurred,” said Foote in a letter.
Reply
#15
In CA we just voted to make cigarette smoking all but illegal, at the same time we voted to make pot smoking legal...Go figure.

As you know we are ridding ourselves of these evil firearms, with or without the consent of the 2nd Amendment.

On a good note, the golf in CA is year-round.
Reply
#16
stanc Wrote:How do you figure it's selective enforcement? The article says the case was dropped due to lack of evidence that the law had been violated.

Here's the original story. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morn...5e16ee9f7c

If you can't make a case when the perpetrator admitted the crime to a reporter, you're either not much of an investigator or you're just not interested in prosecuting.
Paul Peloquin

Did government credibility die of Covid or with Covid?
Reply
#17
biodsl Wrote:Here's the original story. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morn...5e16ee9f7c

If you can't make a case when the perpetrator admitted the crime to a reporter, you're either not much of an investigator or you're just not interested in prosecuting.
Apparently admission of guilt has to be to the authorities in order for them to pursue a case. The pastor didn't do so, none of his parishioners confirmed the story, and no one admitted to storing the gun.

Just out of curiosity, has either the OSP or the DA's office arrested and prosecuted any folks who "think wrong" on guns? I'm wondering if perhaps what you're seeing as "selective enforcement" is actually a matter of the OSP and DA wanting to avoid enforcing that law against anyone.
Reply
#18
What I cant understand is why you even consider complying with these laws-unless your goal is to live to be the oldest person in your nursing home. Ghandi showed the way...non compliance with injustice..True, some will suffer. Thats always the cost of freedom from tyrany.
Reply
#19
Drift Wrote:What I cant understand is why you even consider complying with these laws-unless your goal is to live to be the oldest person in your nursing home. Ghandi showed the way...non compliance with injustice..True, some will suffer. Thats always the cost of freedom from tyrany.

violation of many of these laws would cost the violator all firearms rights
its what the left wants.

even if you do not agree with a law, breaking it is not the way.

work the process, get it changed
Reply
#20
Drift Wrote:What I cant understand is why you even consider complying with these laws-unless your goal is to live to be the oldest person in your nursing home. Ghandi showed the way...non compliance with injustice..True, some will suffer. Thats always the cost of freedom from tyrany.
Are you a fan of Robert Heinlein? Something he once wrote sums up how I've long lived my life:

“I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them.” ~ Robert A. Heinlein
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)