Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Took the grendel out to 1200 today at Thunder Valley!!!!!!!!
#1
Well i took the training class at Thunder valley with Tom and he tought me to shoot out to 1200. Hitting targets out to 900 was no problem with a 7-10 mph cross wind. 1k to 1200 was a bit more tricky but easily doable. Most of the targets were 12x12 and some were 6x9 head cut-outs. lol

Also i was gettin 2620 ft/sec out of factory 123 a-max ammo out of a 24" tube.


Also took out my .223 gun and shot to 1k. i was getting 2900 ft/sec with wc844 and a 69 grain smk.
Reply
#2
Thats sweet. How consistent were your hits at 1200? What was your zoom level?
Reply
#3
The grendel was about 3/5 and the .223 was 2/5 at 1k. Well i have a 20x scope but was more consistant at 10x. The wind was the hardest part, the yardage was no problem. I ran out of scope travel at the 1200 mark even with a 22moa base. Tom said the cartrage with hand loads and more travel with hit 1500 on a good day.
Reply
#4
updated with some pics and a vid.

[Image: 016.jpg]

[Image: 008.jpg]

[Image: 012.jpg]
Reply
#5
double tap
Reply
#6
[Image: th_100_3422.jpg]
Reply
#7
Nice pics and video. What barrel is that? Is that a Vortex Viper 6.5-20x44?
Reply
#8
yes thats the viper 6.5-20 that i got of the post here, The barrel is the aa 24" tube with the threads cut off and a 11* crown put on. I actually sent the scope back to vortex and am having the reticle changed to the bdc reticle for longer range. I ran out of adjustment with a 22moa riser right at 1170.
Reply
#9
Yeah, the customer support from Vortex is pretty exceptional. For the money in that scope, it is a very capable piece of glass. If you're going to get bitten by the long-range bug, you might consider looking into NF for the full elevation travel you will need, because you also need windage travel when the erector tube inside is almost bottomed-out. Vortex also has the Razor HD with tons of elevation travel, but it's a 35mm tube, so you'd need different rings, but they sell them.

It appears that you have to strain a bit to get a proper eye-height to the scope. Would it help if you had a cheek riser to adjust to the natural eye height? If so, I can't recommend the Magpul PRS enough.
Reply
#10
i have been thinking about the prs for a while. cost was a factor so i went with the one on there.
Reply
#11
i have the prs on mine and love it and the mono pod also as lr said i really recommend it
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)