Posts: 8,507
Threads: 241
Joined: Sep 2014
montana Wrote:No problem Klem, I always enjoy yours and others perspectives.
The picture of the shiny bolt tail is a perfect example of what I was talking about..Olympic Arms used a straight cut, undersized gas tube, over sized gas ports and a haywire approach to their rifles too..The real dogma is the need to keep the bolt and carrier carbon free, which I think came from the early days of Vietnam when the ball powder of the time had a high content of calcium carbonate, which was suspected to clog up gas tubes and carriers. Then the white glove maintenance appeared...Just like long gas tube pipe cleaners, carbon scraping tools are completely unnecessary and can actually be detrimental..
Like you said, each to their own..
This is quite a derail from the OPs thread, but...
White glove mandates come from periodic armorer-level inspections. The armorer gauges wont get any useful readings if the critical dimensions on parts are caked in carbon.
Nobody ever explained that to us, so we just thought they were wasting our time with senseless menial tasks to keep the blotter report down (soldiers with spare time = incidents).
The gas system works better when its fouled to an extent, but AR-15s can become sluggish when run with high volume Wolf, suppressed.
The design was engineered around running on tiny stick propellant, which left minimal residue. Ball propellant of course leaves a lot more carbon fouling from the graphite bath that the kernels are given for stability and anti-stick properties.
Original bolts were hard-chromed, which was removed from the TDP after an early joint USAF/US Army fleet study of fatigue cracking mostly around the cam pin holes. They found that hard chroming caused hydrogen embrittlement of the bolt surface with higher incidence of failure nodes, so the phosphated bolt became standard after that.
NRA Basic, Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, RSO
CCW, CQM, DM, Long Range Rifle Instructor
6.5 Grendel Reloading Handbooks & chamber brushes can be found here:
www.AR15buildbox.com
Posts: 3,214
Threads: 215
Joined: Jun 2011
LRRPF52 Wrote:This is quite a derail from the OPs thread, but...
White glove mandates come from periodic armorer-level inspections. The armorer gauges wont get any useful readings if the critical dimensions on parts are caked in carbon.
Nobody ever explained that to us, so we just thought they were wasting our time with senseless menial tasks to keep the blotter report down (soldiers with spare time = incidents).
The gas system works better when its fouled to an extent, but AR-15s can become sluggish when run with high volume Wolf, suppressed.
The design was engineered around running on tiny stick propellant, which left minimal residue. Ball propellant of course leaves a lot more carbon fouling from the graphite bath that the kernels are given for stability and anti-stick properties.
Original bolts were hard-chromed, which was removed from the TDP after an early joint USAF/US Army fleet study of fatigue cracking mostly around the cam pin holes. They found that hard chroming caused hydrogen embrittlement of the bolt surface with higher incidence of failure nodes, so the phosphated bolt became standard after that.
![[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.slidesharecdn.com...ipo=images]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.slidesharecdn.com%2Faia32012finalfinalfinal06110904mcaspresented-pptaa-120606141416-phpapp01%2F95%2Fcauses-and-control-of-fastener-failures-27-728.jpg%3Fcb%3D1338992184&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=e9b2e3ecb7c64a87186afdc0bf8eb450f4cb2911a19894ef367b8f8ae69176ff&ipo=images)
I never stated the rifle, bolt, etc, never needs to be cleaned. Carbon on the boat tail and in the carrier is not the critical concern many think it is and excessive scraping in either area is completely unnecessary and can even be detrimental.There are better ways to remove carbon, no matter how OCD satisfying scraping, sand papering, etc, can be.
The M-16 is an interesting case study and one of my favorite discussions, which I'm sure we could get into a respectful lively discussion, but I have as you said, derailed the OP enough..
Posts: 8,507
Threads: 241
Joined: Sep 2014
montana Wrote:I never stated the rifle, bolt, etc, never needs to be cleaned. Carbon on the boat tail and in the carrier is not the critical concern many think it is and excessive scraping in either area is completely unnecessary and can even be detrimental.There are better ways to remove carbon, no matter how OCD satisfying scraping, sand papering, etc, can be.
The M-16 is an interesting case study and one of my favorite discussions, which I'm sure we could get into a respectful lively discussion, but I have as you said, derailed the OP enough..
Im tracking. I have a personal philosophy that all those years spent white-gloving the weapons counts towards my personal guns by proxy, so I just shoot and lube them!
I Cerakote everything that one might be worried about for corrosion, and lube the engine.
Bore stays fouled until it stops shooting well.
NRA Basic, Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, RSO
CCW, CQM, DM, Long Range Rifle Instructor
6.5 Grendel Reloading Handbooks & chamber brushes can be found here:
www.AR15buildbox.com
Posts: 3,654
Threads: 17
Joined: Aug 2013
LRRPF52 Wrote:Im tracking. I have a personal philosophy that all those years spent white-gloving the weapons counts towards my personal guns by proxy, so I just shoot and lube them! 
I Cerakote everything that one might be worried about for corrosion, and lube the engine.
Bore stays fouled until it stops shooting well.
I'm with 52 on this - it's not that I am uncaring or ignorant about specs but find myself asking which ones matter. For me, I want the most reliable, accurate gun, in this type of gun. With this in mind some specs are more important than others. And in a machine of consumable parts that wear at different speeds, some parts and their specs are more important than others.
Posts: 3,214
Threads: 215
Joined: Jun 2011
11-28-2022, 12:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-04-2022, 01:37 AM by montana.)
Klem Wrote:I'm with 52 on this - it's not that I am uncaring or ignorant about specs but find myself asking which ones matter. For me, I want the most reliable, accurate gun, in this type of gun. With this in mind some specs are more important than others. And in a machine of consumable parts that wear at different speeds, some parts and their specs are more important than others.
I was going to let this one go, but after some thought I decided not to. Specs were created for a reason and when advocating a cleaning method that is detrimental to such spec is beyond my reasoning when it is completely unnecessary. You also advocated reaming and polishing the barrels feed ramps while in the upper receiver, which removes the surface hardened anodized aluminum in the upper. You never remove the anodized portion of the upper's feed ramps, you do it right by removing the barrel from the upper.. It is not only detrimental to the upper, but once again it is also completely unnecessary..You and others can do as they wish with their rifles, but I won't play patsy while being gas lighted when I know better.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHbJovLMuZk
Posts: 937
Threads: 47
Joined: Oct 2019
For years the bolt cleaning on my 3 Gun AR was done with Hoppe's #9, a bronze brush on the tail end & home-made scrapers made of brass for the carrier interiors. Cleaned the bolt & carrier just enough to remove the bigger chunks of carbon. Blew out any residue with a can of carburetor cleaner & then oiled the BCG with Rem-Oil or CLP ... whichever I had at hand. I used that AR for almost 20 years & never had an issue with the BCG. It ran perfectly all the time (still does). It never needed to be absolutely carbon free after cleaning.
I have one of these now ... https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1014765327 ... It works OK. Still only just take off the big chunks. Doesn't have to look brand new ...
I refuse to be victimized by notions of virtuous behavior.
|