08-19-2014, 03:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-19-2014, 03:22 AM by NugginFutz.)
Thanks, Greg, Butter.
That's some darn good shooting, yourself, Greg.
I neglected to mention that those groups were shot with the same lower and scope. The scope, a Vortex 6-24x50 PST, is mounted on an ADM Recon QD mount. Both groups were shot after swapping uppers out and remounting the scope. Between the two uppers, there was a .1 mil elevation change and .5 mil windage shift. When the "home configuration" was reassembled (264 LBC, Vortex and lower), it delivered the group seen above with no sighters. Now if I can just find the cure for my perpetual case of "tinker-itis" and leave the setup alone until September, I will have a decent chance of doing ok with the DM portion of the course.
Here's a pic of the setup with the BHW 5.56 upper mounted.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5481[/ATTACH]
I never did use the rear bag, so I'm pretty pleased about that.
ETA: time for me to stop 'jacking Greg's thread and shut up, now.
That's some darn good shooting, yourself, Greg.
I neglected to mention that those groups were shot with the same lower and scope. The scope, a Vortex 6-24x50 PST, is mounted on an ADM Recon QD mount. Both groups were shot after swapping uppers out and remounting the scope. Between the two uppers, there was a .1 mil elevation change and .5 mil windage shift. When the "home configuration" was reassembled (264 LBC, Vortex and lower), it delivered the group seen above with no sighters. Now if I can just find the cure for my perpetual case of "tinker-itis" and leave the setup alone until September, I will have a decent chance of doing ok with the DM portion of the course.
Here's a pic of the setup with the BHW 5.56 upper mounted.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5481[/ATTACH]
I never did use the rear bag, so I'm pretty pleased about that.
ETA: time for me to stop 'jacking Greg's thread and shut up, now.