04-11-2014, 12:57 AM
JASmith Wrote:Because some of them have relevant experience but cannot claim it for a number of valid reasons...The only relevant experience is in design and development of metallic links.
Quote:...and the rest are light years closer to the issue than folks who have personally designed or developed modern weapons.I have no idea what that means. :confused:
Quote:There are much larger questions that need to be worked than the one you continue to hammer away at.I'm only responding to other people's posts. You, however, are using inordinate amounts of page space repeatedly telling me to stop replying. Perhaps you should take your own advice, and put your efforts into more productive posts.
Quote:By allowing the question stand unanswered tos your satisfaction, but still part of a sane development plan, you can help guide the discussion into the areas truly meaningful to the question of whether the 6.5 Grendel has a role in the machine gun.6.5 Grendel can be a machine gun cartridge only if a viable disintegrating link design can be created for it. Without knowing that, any other discussion about a Grendel LMG would be pointless.
Quote:Get those other questions resolved, and the link question will find its appropriate place in the effort.For the umpteenth time, what other questions? I don't have any, myself.
