cory Wrote:when someone introduces an untested variant to cover their failure in manufacturing to an acceptable quality, this for me is completely unacceptable.
Do you know it hasn't been tested? This print of the Grendel II is dated 2008. Is it possible this reamer has been used for a while and finally came to be public is all.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4904[/ATTACH]
I do agree with everyone's opinion that it is a variant of the Grendel but as far as not being tested is an assumption.
