03-16-2014, 07:52 PM
LRRPF52 Wrote:All my experiences with M855 on human tissue have been very consistent: Avulsive tissue destruction, larger-than-normal wounds with grotesque characteristics, life-changing or life-ending terminal performance.I do not doubt that your experiences with M855 are other than what you claim. However, I'm sure that you can have seen only a very small percentage of wounds inflicted by 5.56mm weapons. Plus, tests done by Fackler and the US Army do show variations in onset of yaw with M855, as shown below.
If there is one cartridge we should be looking at that needs replacement, it is the 7.62 NATO.
I can't agree that 7.62 NATO needs to be replaced. It works well enough as vehicle armament and in a number of other applications. But, I can see where it might be a good idea to field a SAW/DMR cartridge that is smaller and lighter than 7.62 NATO.
![[Image: 40052-MilitaryAssaultRifleWPcopy.jpg]](http://www.ar15.com/ammo/project/Misc_Images/DocGKR/40052-MilitaryAssaultRifleWPcopy.jpg)
