New Cartridge Developments and Implications for Dismounted Infantry Soldiers
#89
JWH Wrote:Stan, it's "the ballistics, stupid!" I find it amusing that when the 6.8 guys have moments of honesty and clarity, such as Clint's proposal for a 6.8x46 and Cris "6.8 Designer" Murray's proposal for a 7x46, they advocate the very principles that define the 65G's genius: moderate velocity and high BC bullets.
John, I found it quite amusing, too. Really had to fight the urge to comment about that aspect, because I didn't want to say anything that might discourage them. Besides, I aggravate and annoy them enough. Wink
Quote:Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery and I'm glad to see these guys are coming around. Of course, they can't admit the 65G was right all along...
No, they'll never admit to that, even as they develop what is essentially a Grendel magnum.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
New Cartridge Developments and Implications for Dismounted Infantry Soldiers - by stanc - 07-24-2011, 05:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)