06-20-2013, 04:59 AM
Variable,
I understand your apprehension on this issue. And, my effort to get a major U.S. arms manufacturer to offer a legal electronically-actuated trigger on an auto-loading (semi-automatic) rifle is intended to clear up the widespread ambiguity on the Internet surrounding electronic triggers.
See my earlier Reply, above, eTrigger Adjustable Electronic Trigger System (http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/sho...p?t=317395), Page 23, Reply #341, By BulZi, wherein, he clarifies a legal electronic trigger, while pointing out some other types that the ATF have deemed illegal.
Today's typical Bullpup trigger-to-sear arrangement leaves a lot to be desired, to say the least: typically, about a 10-pound pull. It's not surprising, therefore, that "bad triggers" ranks among the few downsides, when considering Bullpups. A proper electronic trigger is the answer, at least for civilian models.
I understand your apprehension on this issue. And, my effort to get a major U.S. arms manufacturer to offer a legal electronically-actuated trigger on an auto-loading (semi-automatic) rifle is intended to clear up the widespread ambiguity on the Internet surrounding electronic triggers.
See my earlier Reply, above, eTrigger Adjustable Electronic Trigger System (http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/sho...p?t=317395), Page 23, Reply #341, By BulZi, wherein, he clarifies a legal electronic trigger, while pointing out some other types that the ATF have deemed illegal.
Today's typical Bullpup trigger-to-sear arrangement leaves a lot to be desired, to say the least: typically, about a 10-pound pull. It's not surprising, therefore, that "bad triggers" ranks among the few downsides, when considering Bullpups. A proper electronic trigger is the answer, at least for civilian models.

