07-07-2011, 02:25 PM
You could be right -- but we'll need more than a cartoon to resolve. Problem is, I was (and might still be) under the impression that there's a gap between the cartridges.
'Sorry 'bout complications, but that's the way life is. Simplify where possible, but make sure nothing important gets left out in the simplification.
In the way of complications -- if the magazine is purpose-built for the cartridge and, as you point out, the cartridges are stacked as efficiently as possible (the reason for the double contact between bases), then the magazine thickness also decreases.
I hope we get it worked through!
'Sorry 'bout complications, but that's the way life is. Simplify where possible, but make sure nothing important gets left out in the simplification.
In the way of complications -- if the magazine is purpose-built for the cartridge and, as you point out, the cartridges are stacked as efficiently as possible (the reason for the double contact between bases), then the magazine thickness also decreases.
stanc Wrote:Read it earlier today. Didn't see any "standard" in it then, don't see one now.(sigh...) Oh well, another indication of not being on the same page.
I hope we get it worked through!