07-07-2011, 02:11 AM
Tony Williams Wrote:Of course, we can debate the meaning of "significant"That's on the money!
Statistically speaking, it simply means a result which could not have been achieved by chance...
Frankly, I was using a looser meaning of the definition -- one more in line with Gene's 50% plus up. We could start with numbers of rounds per kilogram and/or numbers of rounds in a magazine the size of the current 20 round magazine. Don't know if 50% is the right threshold.
Yes, it would need to be demonstrated to the standard you called our attention to.
