04-27-2013, 02:03 PM
That fact that the Boston Bombing somehow rekindles a gun control debate is ridiculous. Boston has some of the strictest gun laws, yet these guys obtained pistols. One of them by shooting a cop to get his pistol. Just like Lanza did to get his mom's AR and other guns. So laws or gun laws can't stop somebody with the intent to kill people. They are breaking the law to kill people so why do they car about the lesser gun laws.
The @ss clowns in Boston also weren't supposed to be making bombs and blowing people up. That's against the law, but they did it anyway. So using this tragedy to try for more gun control is idiotic in all logic.
The right need to approach it that with a killer on the loose wouldn't you want to have whatever weapon to defend your home.
What if the LEO didn't find the Chenchen and assumed he had escaped. Then when all is clear he comes crawling out of the boat with the owner at home. Well at that point it is the killer and the home owner, mano y mano. Wouldn't you want to have as much firepower as possible.
The @ss clowns in Boston also weren't supposed to be making bombs and blowing people up. That's against the law, but they did it anyway. So using this tragedy to try for more gun control is idiotic in all logic.
The right need to approach it that with a killer on the loose wouldn't you want to have whatever weapon to defend your home.
What if the LEO didn't find the Chenchen and assumed he had escaped. Then when all is clear he comes crawling out of the boat with the owner at home. Well at that point it is the killer and the home owner, mano y mano. Wouldn't you want to have as much firepower as possible.