LR1955 Wrote:DJ:
So, do you think that no AR was used? Or that no handgun was used? Or that both were used?
Given the number of people who witnessed the incident, and the number of people involved in the investigation, it would be impossible for the US Government to alter evidence or coerce the witnesses to the extent that every one of them, to include every single LEA who was there, would say the same story to this day. One of those people would have blown the whistle on any cover up or tampering with evidence.
The information age has made it harder for a government in a fee society to bullshit its population.
LR1955
Impossible how exactly do you come to that conclusion? The impossible has been done many times in history and will be done many more times in the future, I hope.
LR1955 you assume that one of the LEOs would of blown the whistle. While I'd like for your assumption to be true, there's nothing to back it up.
You also assume that all the LEOs knew exactly what was going on. In that large chaotic scene what percentage of the LEOs do you assume had a big picture view of the situation? I'm not sure how LEOs operate, but I'm assuming it's similar to military in that orders where issued and the individual LEOs followed those orders and performed their duties to the best of their abilities.
What I'm getting at is that I'm assuming only a handful of LEOs know exactly what happened that day. In a sector of our society that doesn't belief in the 2nd Amendment, what do you think the priority of those LEOs is to spread the truth to the American people or to protect their families rather it be physically or just protecting what little bit of normalcy they've found in their lives since the tragedy?
LR1955 Wrote:DJ:
So, you don't believe those kids were killed by the perp using guns. Despite all of the witnesses.
Then, what killed those people?
LR1955
After reviewing hours of video footage from that day and combining that with the sealing of the evidence in what should of been an open and shut case, I believe, I'm sorry, I know something isn't what it seems and we're being lied to. What they're lying about I don't know for sure.
I will guarantee you this, best case scenario in an effort to push their attacks on the 2nd Amendment actors were hired to portray parents who had lost their kids in that tragedy.
Does anyone recall a post on the forum from a member talking about running into a politician at a local shop buying reloading tools? They had mention the politician had said something along the lines of watch for an attack on the ability to reload. I'm not making any accusations at this point. However; if it comes out that reloading powder was responsible for these bombs and the washington begins an attack on reloading supplies. :/ Again it's way to early to make any conspiracy accusations and there's no evidence of any conspiracy at this time.
That being said I wouldn't put anything past the libtards and the leadership of this country.
Right now as it stands, in my opinion this was a terrorist attack committed by a cell that had been in place for some time. A last minute green light was given when a target of opportunity was realized. If that was a case this was a direct result from our reaction to Benghazi and the offer attacks that day.
My prayers go out to all those affected by this attack!
"Those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither." Benjamin Franklin

