How does 6.5 Grendal compare to other rounds (GPC)

[ricsmall]

What advantage do you see in the 6.5x47?

I own all three, .260 Rem, 6.5x47 Lapua, and 6.5 Creedmoor and find the 6.5 Creedmoor to be superior, at least in my uses. If I drive the 6.5x47 to my Creedmoor performance, brass is short lived. I can buy factory loaded ammunition from Hornady in 6.5 Creedmoor that will produce .5 MOA accuracy at half the cost of Lapua factory loaded ammunition and I can buy Hornady Superformance ammunition that while not quite as accurate will obtain 150 fps more velocity. The brass is cheaper and of very high quality, you could argue that it isn't as high of quality as the Lapua which is available for both the .260 and the 6.5x47 but I can obtain the same accuracy and life with the Hornady bass as the Lapua brass. So, although I am fond of Lapua brass, in practical terms it offers no advantage.
But I must admit I'm potentially partial to the 6.5 Hornady and may see things from that slant. And the three cartridges are so close that any advantage is very hard to discover, that is unless you shoot factory ammo and the the .260 is a dog compared to the other two.

Bob

Thanks for that comparison bob. A friend and I are about to build 2 rifles and I had narrowed it down to 6.5 CM and 260 rem. this helps a great deal, though I do have one question. I am a hand loader, so do you have a compelling argument for one over the other in that regard. I must say, I was leaning toward the creedmore, maybe because it's newer, but I think mostly because I prefer the case design/shoulder angle of the CM.

Thanks
Richard