03-22-2013, 06:08 PM
LR1955 Wrote:Montana:I think we already had this discussion. The problem with the Indian holocaust was about an apathetic population which created the indifference the U.S. military had with it's native population. The majority of U.S. forces are very pro 2nd amendment today except a few political high up generals. Maybe this is why we are seeing a stronger emphases on a much stronger homeland security force which is very political. During Ruby Ridge a Denver swat team leader stated they were given orders to shoot to kill. He told his men they were not going to do it. The government was still able to do what they did. I don't believe the military would purposely kill 80% of anybody in the U.S. But with enough propaganda anything can be possible. This is why our first amendment is so important. If the American citizens in the 1800's were able to see the horror being done to the American Indian, things may have been different. But if they were only able to see the horror being committed by the Indians ,"as was usually the case", we end up with a wounded knee.
What Cav outfits were involved in Ruby Ridge or at Waco?
Do you believe that the US military will surround your town and then kill 80% of the population of your town like the first Wounded Knee?
Yes or no is good enough.
LR1955

