02-15-2013, 08:13 PM
There is an extensive set of legal precedent and law that requires the police to use firearms for self-defense only.
This guy is either shamefully ignorant of the law and policy or is outright lying. Neither is a good example our law-enforcement community.
--- I wrote my comment before viewing the guy in the baseball cap. I've seen him talk before -- he has an elegant way of putting forward the case for defending and protecting the Second Amendment. Hope to hear more from him!
BTW -- I did not laugh, close to crying over the example set by this less than sterling 'police chief' -- by brother in law is a law enforcement officer who knows first hand the value of a firearm for self defense.
This guy is either shamefully ignorant of the law and policy or is outright lying. Neither is a good example our law-enforcement community.
--- I wrote my comment before viewing the guy in the baseball cap. I've seen him talk before -- he has an elegant way of putting forward the case for defending and protecting the Second Amendment. Hope to hear more from him!
BTW -- I did not laugh, close to crying over the example set by this less than sterling 'police chief' -- by brother in law is a law enforcement officer who knows first hand the value of a firearm for self defense.