02-11-2013, 02:47 AM
Variable Wrote:It could just be me, but I kind of get the impression you may be splitting hairs here intentionally-- with some possible ulterior point to prove? Do you perhaps have something to market, and are setting up your case for it before presenting it? I'm just being sure I understand your motives completely.If I may butt in here, I'd like to opine that Guardsman has no ulterior motives. I've engaged in a number of discussions with him on the MG&A forum, and have no doubt that he has a sincere motivation to optimize the combat capability of infantry riflemen and machine gunners.
