02-05-2013, 02:47 AM
I have a concern that the current AWB that has been proposed is possibly a "bait in switch" bill. Maybe what the administration is really after is not the evil black guns and Feinstein's list of 157 guns to ban. They may use that list as bargaining chip when the bill is modified and rewritten in a back-room bipartisan deal. they may drop the banned gun list in favor of what they really want, which is the national who has what database (so they know where to get the guns later in a martial law scenario) and an AMMUNITION BAN. Think about it. What good is a semi auto rifle without ammo to feed it. What if they were planning the ammo ban for a year or so now... What would they do. They would buy out the civilian market of ammo before the ammo bill gets serious traction. They would use a bait in switch so that the gun owners and NRA are sort of appeased. Have you tried to buy .223 lately. How about primers. The surge of federal sales is not from the military. The military is scaling back from conflict. The billions, Yes with a B, of rounds that are on order are to the alphabet agencies such DHS and they get priority.
There is a ammo ban already proposed for Internet sales in the house.
Just a therory......
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/...tion-Sales
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-18...ntial.html
http://www.foac-pac.org/news/738-ammo-ban
http://www.ammoland.com/2013/01/environm...z2JzBOnO5S
There is a ammo ban already proposed for Internet sales in the house.
Just a therory......
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/...tion-Sales
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-18...ntial.html
http://www.foac-pac.org/news/738-ammo-ban
http://www.ammoland.com/2013/01/environm...z2JzBOnO5S
