Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If ‘Assault Weapons’ Are Bad…Why Does DHS Want to Buy 7,000 of Them for ‘Personal Def
#2
Because the DHS is an Agency that existed before Obama, and they would be wanting them regardless of who is currently Prez? Also they don't make Legislation, they mostly do what they are told?

Either way though--- I definitely support your right to possess one (or two or three...).Smile

I also would support legislation holding LE to the exact same weapon standards as "mere" citizens. Good for the Goose/Gander and all. That's politico stuff also though. Legislative and not normal executive.

From the Solicitation: "3.12.2 The overall length of the firearm shall not exceed 20 inches with the stock fully retracted and/or folded." Hunh????? It's gonna suck then. Even a Colt SCW is 22.81".

ETA: Posting kind of dizzy tonight (sleep deprivation). I'm additionally of the opinion that most Federal LE should take a major haircut, and be reduced drastically in size (my branch included). Some Agencies should be eliminated completely....
Life member NRA, SAF, GOA, WVSRPA (and VFW). Also member WVCDL. Join NOW!!!!!
We either hang together on this, or we'll certainly HANG separately.....
Reply


Messages In This Thread
If ‘Assault Weapons’ Are Bad…Why Does DHS Want to Buy 7,000 of Them for ‘Personal Def - by Variable - 01-28-2013, 07:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)