01-29-2013, 02:15 AM
LRRPF52, I am certain that you are a thoughtful and well-read man.
Can we agree on three flaws in some analyses offered here?
(1) Immersing oneself in the history and geopolitics vetted by the perpetrators affords no monopoly on insight or reality, only a facile and better rehearsed "party line" than those of us who arehow did the poster put it?fat ignoramuses.
(2) To insist there is no political litmus test for general officers to accede to the agenda of command and control is to deny all of recorded history. It is actually remarkable that we file it under "news" when it is actually axiomatic.
(3) Discounting/ignoring the damage already inflicted by the bankster/warmonger tribe, while mostly finger-pointing at the Chinese and Islamic tribes, will generate a distorted picture that barely approximates reality, enables the enemy already in our midst, and so precludes effective defense.
Agree?
Can we agree on three flaws in some analyses offered here?
(1) Immersing oneself in the history and geopolitics vetted by the perpetrators affords no monopoly on insight or reality, only a facile and better rehearsed "party line" than those of us who arehow did the poster put it?fat ignoramuses.
(2) To insist there is no political litmus test for general officers to accede to the agenda of command and control is to deny all of recorded history. It is actually remarkable that we file it under "news" when it is actually axiomatic.
(3) Discounting/ignoring the damage already inflicted by the bankster/warmonger tribe, while mostly finger-pointing at the Chinese and Islamic tribes, will generate a distorted picture that barely approximates reality, enables the enemy already in our midst, and so precludes effective defense.
Agree?