Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why the 2nd Amendment may no longer be revelent to the Federal Government
#26
BjornF16 Wrote:They got away with NFA of 1934 because it didn't prohibit anything, it just "taxed" it. Much like ObamaCare mandate was upheld as a "tax".

I disagree it is not like the obama care mandate. The 2nd clearly states "The right to bear arms shall not be infringed upon". A tax is clearly an infringement.

The administration clearly believes that requiring a "costly" ID to vote infringes upon an individual's right to vote. Should that shame idea not apply to the 2nd?
"Those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither." Benjamin Franklin
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why the 2nd Amendment may no longer be revelent to the Federal Government - by cory - 01-18-2013, 02:13 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)