05-14-2011, 10:22 PM
JASmith Wrote:Stan, I understand your point --- and feel that much of the existing ballistics test data -- interior, exterior, and terminal -- already supports our investigation. the admiral's test won't do much absent a relevance statement. The thing we're working in this thread does that.Yeah, I'm sure you're right, Joe. It's just that I've been discussing and writing about this for more than a decade, and I have reached the point where I think it is past time for talking, and now it's time to start shooting.
It also does that in a way that allows trades in capability and costs, making it very powerful during the advocacy phase. The document we are working will establish relevance in the bean-counting world and, more importantly, let us would-be developers understand what is doable given the multitude of constraints.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUslGSoEH8I
But hey, don't mind me. I'm just venting my frustration...
