12-18-2023, 04:46 PM
Jasper,
And yet you wrote earlier that you update your QL on an annual basis. Surely it has some utility for you. I keep saying this regarding GIGO, measure the volume of your own cases, especially now we have established how much difference there is between brands.
Scrape,
Yet you asked the Forum to run QL for you. We then established that in the 100Barnes hypothetical comparing Barnes' actual tests with QL's simulation it is as close as 0.4gns. Even I was surprised as to how close QL is here.
(I don't have a conflict of interest where QL is concerned but the bashing it gets from people who are not prepared to enter precise data is revealing. If you think the program is too complex then by all means rely on manufacturer tables, but don't bash what you don't understand).
And yet you wrote earlier that you update your QL on an annual basis. Surely it has some utility for you. I keep saying this regarding GIGO, measure the volume of your own cases, especially now we have established how much difference there is between brands.
Scrape,
Yet you asked the Forum to run QL for you. We then established that in the 100Barnes hypothetical comparing Barnes' actual tests with QL's simulation it is as close as 0.4gns. Even I was surprised as to how close QL is here.
(I don't have a conflict of interest where QL is concerned but the bashing it gets from people who are not prepared to enter precise data is revealing. If you think the program is too complex then by all means rely on manufacturer tables, but don't bash what you don't understand).