11-10-2023, 04:49 PM
5th Circuit Panel Unanimously Finds ATFs 80 Percent Firearm Frame Rule Unlawful
5th Circuit Panel Finds ATF's 80 Percent Firearm Frame Rule Illegal (breitbart.com)
Excerpts from the article:
A three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided on Thursday against the ATFs 80 percent frame rule, finding that the ATF overstepped its bounds in issuing it.
All three judges on the Fifth Circuit panel decided against the ATFs rule.
Engelhardt wrote the courts opinion and noted:[INDENT]The agency rule at issue here flouts clear statutory text and exceeds the legislatively-imposed limits on agency authority in the name of public policy. Because Congress has neither authorized the expansion of firearm regulation nor permitted the criminalization of previously lawful conduct, the proposed rule constitutes unlawful agency action, in direct contravention of the legislatures will.[/INDENT]
Oldham, concurring, pointed to what he saw as the ATFs core blunder: ATFs foundational legal error is that it conflated two very different statutes: the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the National Firearms Act of 1934. Those two statutes give ATF very different powers to regulate very different types of weapons.
5th Circuit Panel Finds ATF's 80 Percent Firearm Frame Rule Illegal (breitbart.com)
Excerpts from the article:
A three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided on Thursday against the ATFs 80 percent frame rule, finding that the ATF overstepped its bounds in issuing it.
All three judges on the Fifth Circuit panel decided against the ATFs rule.
Engelhardt wrote the courts opinion and noted:[INDENT]The agency rule at issue here flouts clear statutory text and exceeds the legislatively-imposed limits on agency authority in the name of public policy. Because Congress has neither authorized the expansion of firearm regulation nor permitted the criminalization of previously lawful conduct, the proposed rule constitutes unlawful agency action, in direct contravention of the legislatures will.[/INDENT]
Oldham, concurring, pointed to what he saw as the ATFs core blunder: ATFs foundational legal error is that it conflated two very different statutes: the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the National Firearms Act of 1934. Those two statutes give ATF very different powers to regulate very different types of weapons.
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"

