And the ruling may ultimately affect all states in a similar situation. Magazine ban finally overturned---again!:
https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/...-magazines
One highlight of the ruling:
The only negative thing is that the Judge applied a 10-day stay on his injunction. I guess that's not uncommon. Or he got his hand slapped by his higher-ups for how the last ruling turned out.
https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/...-magazines
One highlight of the ruling:
Quote:In other words, Heller made the logical connection between weapons commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes that would also be useful, if necessary, for military purposes, i.e., in the militia. Since Miller, the Supreme Court has enlarged the breadth of firearms protected by the Second Amendment to include commonly owned firearms useful for the core right of self-defense and other lawful purposes like hunting, sporting, and target shooting. Until the Supreme Court clearly says otherwise, commonly owned weapons that are useful for war and are reasonably related to militia use are also fully protected, so long as they are not useful solely for military purposes. Firearms with magazines holding more than 10 rounds are such reasonably-related arms.
The only negative thing is that the Judge applied a 10-day stay on his injunction. I guess that's not uncommon. Or he got his hand slapped by his higher-ups for how the last ruling turned out.

