05-02-2012, 05:23 PM
LRRPF52 Wrote:QUOTE]http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...0711000358
You're right. I'm sure the communists dressed up like scientists were probably paid by the "environmentalists" to run this study for the sole purpose of taking away your ammo. Nope, no holes in that theory. Sound like it will hold up to all your apparently absolute critical thinking skills. Pfff, science. You're right, those damn commies and their fabrications.
Seriously though, the point of the article, which was the first one I saw that seemed relevant, was to share a report stating that lead in the environment might actually be an issue for the welfare of endangered species. There are many more out there. This is a sensitive issue, but one worth at least considering. If we really are "the most effective conservationalists" out there, then we would not be so hasty to spit and rant about political agendas because the scientific community has raised a concern on the implications of depositing lead in the topsoil.
By all means, disagree eith me. That's what makes discussions interesting. But the topic is what real scientific evidence suggests, not what paranoid political theories you have dreamed up. I don't mean to offend, but that was a rant if I ever heard one. Let's see some primary research articles, not something written in a gun mag, that disputes the negative effects of lead ingestion on wild life, or perhaps something that proves that lead placed in the soil will stay put and can't leach into food or water supplies. The ball is in your court, but it will take more than your opinion to persuade me or any of the people you claim are out to disarm you.