Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5th Circuit of Appeals Strikes down bump stock ban 13-3
#7
Additional information from the ruling...

[FONT=&amp]Additionally, Elrod explainedthat the court’s majority found the ATF’s bump stock ban violated the “rule oflenity” by imposing criminal liability on people who had legally purchased aproduct against which there was no law.[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp](Judge) Elrod wrote:[/FONT]
[INDENT][FONT=&amp]A rich legal tradition supports the “well known rule” that“penal laws are to be construed strictly”…(United States v.Wiltberger). As Chief Justice Marshall explained long ago, the rule“is founded on the tenderness of the law for the rights of individuals; and onthe plain principle that the power of punishment is vested in the legislative,not in the judicial department. It is the legislature, not the Court, which isto define a crime, and ordain its punishment.”[/FONT][/INDENT]
[FONT=&amp]The Fifth Circuit’s decision can be appealed to the SupremeCourt of the United States. At this time, no indication has been given as towhether or not an appeal will be filed.[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]The Fifth Circuit’s application of the “rule of lenity” couldcome into play in lawsuits against an anticipated ATF ban on stabilizer bracesfor AR pistols. It is presumed that the ATF’s stabilizer brace ban will giveowners a set amount of time to turn them in, after which time those whocontinue to possess them will be committing a crime.[/FONT]
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"
Reply


Messages In This Thread
5th Circuit of Appeals Strikes down bump stock ban 13-3 - by grayfox - 01-08-2023, 02:30 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)