I had a partial case head separation using a 1.8oz buffer

[Klem]

If you’re comfortable with a program that kicks out those kinds of numbers, it really defies the general attention-to-detail I’ve come to expect from your posts.

I don’t know what the issue is with fixation with QL. It’s just wrong with the numbers it generates for 6.5 Grendel, by huge margins.

This is the reasoning behind why I call out QL the way I do. It isn’t a personal slight on anyone if they happen to be involved with it professionally.

Like Lapua, QL does not have a tendency to catastrophically fail. It's not a zero-sum game of QL works/does not work, and nothing in between. If you can dial down the absolutist rhetoric then it will be closer to the truth. Some, like me use it knowing it is not exact in some predictions, but it others it is; it's been a great help.

Lets' not start on QL here or this thread will turn into a life story. For now we can agree to disagree.