I had a partial case head separation using a 1.8oz buffer
#95
Look at that snipershide thread, very interesting.
Note, for this comment, post #61, it's a pic of the Odin barrel chamber chamfer, a 2-step angle radiusing...
"[FONT=&amp]You can't really catch it with your fingernail like a step, but can feel it and measure it. It looks like Odin does a double angle chamfer and the step appears to line up with the steeper/deeper chamfer."

Would the OP ridge line up with that second chamfer in his Odin 12" also...

I'm still processing that thread. Might be a combo of lapua case design (not saying it's bad, but it is different at the case/web interface) and a double chamfer leaving the interface unsupported. Plus maybe other factors, like I said I'm still digesting that thread. Bill A and '52 are both in on those discussions.
Ledzep has some very interesting comments.

I have 4 6ARcs, 3 gas and one bolt. All of the chamfers are single radius, and appear to be shallower into the chamber depth, no Odin's, 3 mfrs among my 4.
I'm not getting any ridges, but then again I don't use any lapua.

Lapua's design, being earlier in grendel's product life, could it be its web/corner was not "exposed" (not unsupported) by the bolt face depths being 0.125 back then? I wonder, I was not into grendel at that time.

edit to add: in my early days of 6Arc I was actually loading just a "tad" too hot, and didn't realize it til later. But didn't get any ridges or belts that I remenber.[/FONT]
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"
Reply


Messages In This Thread
I had a partial case head separation using a 1.8oz buffer - by grayfox - 09-25-2022, 12:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)