Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Barnes 100 gr. vs 115 gr. TTSX
#1
I want to load for mule deer at distances greater than 200 yards. This will be from a bolt-action rifle with a 24" barrel. I've had good penetration with the 115 gr. at 140 and 180 yards but have not recovered bullets to see the expansion. I understand from tests others have reported than the 100 gr. TTSX needs about 2000 fps to have good expansion. Barnes may report a lower velocity, but the expansion even in water at that velocity is minimal. I have not been able to find similar information for the 115 gr., only speculation that it will expand at lower velocities.

At long range, am I better off with the 115 gr. at 1800 fps, or the 100 gr. at 2000 fps?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Barnes 100 gr. vs 115 gr. TTSX - by stead - 08-12-2022, 08:32 PM
Barnes 100 gr. vs 115 gr. TTSX - by grayfox - 08-12-2022, 09:14 PM
Barnes 100 gr. vs 115 gr. TTSX - by myrifle - 08-12-2022, 10:41 PM
Barnes 100 gr. vs 115 gr. TTSX - by stead - 08-13-2022, 01:12 AM
Barnes 100 gr. vs 115 gr. TTSX - by Happy2Shoot - 08-13-2022, 02:21 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)