grayfox Wrote:It also, by its analysis and stressing that the 2A has a central essence in the right to personally carry arms for self-defense, this strikes down the lefty reasoning that the 2A is only about the State being able to have some arms for military needs.
This is a PERSONAL right, for INDIVIDUAL citizens. To CARRY as well as to own or have.
Not a second-class right either.
The lefty reasoning that the 2A is only about the State being able to have some arms for military needs is nonsense. The Heller case proved the right to own arms is not linked to the militia.. The first sentence is a statement: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, meaning trained and equipped. The second sentence is an order to government: the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Leftist logic: the people need permission from the tyrannical government for the types of arms they are allowed to own to fight the very same tyrannical government..Talk about mental gymnastics LOL..