NGSW, disruptive innovations, and the small military team?
#5
The other area I see potential for NGSW technology is in smaller firearms cases that can duplicate or exceed existing ballistic profiles of common small arms.

Something like a .224 Fireball case form factor pushing the same velocities as 5.56 NATO.

Something like 6.5 Grendel form factor could maybe generate .260 AI velocities, maybe increase the COL to 2.5” for optimum seating depth, but still have a firearm that feels like an AR-15, not a heavy and cumbersome AR-10.

The .270-08 form factor requires the large magazines from 7.62 NATO, which is a volumetric problem on the soldier’s load.

We’ve had this conversation here for many years on what the dismounted small arms configurations could look like with some improvements in propellant and case technology.

* Individual small arms the size and profile of the KAC PDW or other PDW-type weapons matching or exceeding 5.56 external ballistics, with a smaller magazine footprint.
* Carbines chambered in something smaller than 7.62 NATO that exceed 7.62 NATO external ballistics, with less recoil and smaller, lighter magazines.

I like the 2.500” COL cartridge form factor for the larger platform, which would out-perform 6.5 Creedmoor.

I think they went too big with NGSW just from a soldier’s load, recoil, and cartridge form factor perspective. That was driven by the arbitrary point of nailing down .277” bore diameter and projectile form factor that was dictated to the respondents for the RFIs.
NRA Basic, Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, RSO

CCW, CQM, DM, Long Range Rifle Instructor

6.5 Grendel Reloading Handbooks & chamber brushes can be found here:

www.AR15buildbox.com
Reply


Messages In This Thread
NGSW, disruptive innovations, and the small military team? - by LRRPF52 - 03-18-2022, 03:26 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)