Double Naught Spy Wrote:Again, you have some proof of a threat? What were they defending against? People walking and chanting? Scary stuff walking and chanting.
I like how you discount their ugly history but give credence to the history of BLM. Funny how you discount historical information so conveniently when it doesn't fit your narrative.
Since you are such a fine legal eagle, maybe you can explain the charges levied against the McCloskeys' today.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/st...story.html
https://www.foxnews.com/us/st-louis-mccl...rdner-guns
Oh look, it is an assault charge.
Like I said, I am sure the McCloskeys will present video and audio from their security system that will support their case, right?
I have no doubt they were threatened. The question is whether they were threatened before or pointing their guns at the crowd.
Ugly history is your opinion, based on zero prosecution LOL. Black lives matter's history is obvious with many convictions and statements of such... No legal eagle here, just observation based on facts given so far, unlike yourself.. The DA has to prove this case, before I will condemn their actions, "unlike you playing mentalist" by stating their securely system will support their case...There is political controversy, since the governor stated he will probably pardon them if convicted...Like I have stated many times before, "we can give conjecture all day" the only thing that matters is a conviction......Last week, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., urged Attorney General Bill Barr to investigate Gardner over her decision to investigate the couple, saying the prosecutor has been hostile to gun rights in the past.