Armed couple who defended their home

[Double Naught Spy]

Apparently you don't. I repeat: Missouri, stand your ground law: if you have the right to be in a specific location, you have the right to defend yourself or anyone else in serious danger. ... Generally, stand your ground laws give people the legal right to defend themselves and anyone else who is in mortal danger (as long as they have a legal right to be in the area). Weather you believe they were or weren't being threatened or if they abuse the legal system is irrelevant. It is what can be proven in a court of law...The mob was trespassing and BLM has a history of violence, arson and vandalism, which is a reasonable assumption they were in immediate threat. Of course once again, it is what the legal system will determine that counts...

Again, you have some proof of a threat? What were they defending against? People walking and chanting? Scary stuff walking and chanting.

I like how you discount their ugly history but give credence to the history of BLM. Funny how you discount historical information so conveniently when it doesn't fit your narrative.

Since you are such a fine legal eagle, maybe you can explain the charges levied against the McCloskeys' today.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/st...story.html
https://www.foxnews.com/us/st-louis-mccl...rdner-guns

Oh look, it is an assault charge.

We’re probably never going to know the truth. Because those liberal trespassers edited the video .I believe the McCloskey’s were threatened.Because I take anyone’s word over a lying communist liberal.

Like I said, I am sure the McCloskeys will present video and audio from their security system that will support their case, right?

I have no doubt they were threatened. The question is whether they were threatened before or pointing their guns at the crowd.