05-29-2020, 08:00 AM
Lemonaid,
Here are your two sets of data, graphed.
There is a correlation between velocity and group size with the best load at 28.7. This is muddied however by the huge difference at max load 29.1. It is just as likely the wide group at 29 was the shooter (no offence). You need more data. I would focus on 28.6 upwards and shoot a few more groups to get the average.
One thing you need to do is keep all the group sizes the same. No 3rd groups mixed with 5rd groups. This is not a statistically large sample size so your ability to shoot small 3rd groups and large 5rd groups is going to mess up the trends.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16226[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]16227[/ATTACH]
Here are your two sets of data, graphed.
There is a correlation between velocity and group size with the best load at 28.7. This is muddied however by the huge difference at max load 29.1. It is just as likely the wide group at 29 was the shooter (no offence). You need more data. I would focus on 28.6 upwards and shoot a few more groups to get the average.
One thing you need to do is keep all the group sizes the same. No 3rd groups mixed with 5rd groups. This is not a statistically large sample size so your ability to shoot small 3rd groups and large 5rd groups is going to mess up the trends.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16226[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]16227[/ATTACH]