Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Help me end my Low mass Vs full mass dilemma
#8
My biggest concern with a CLGS 12.5" barrel suppressed is keeping the bolt locked as long as possible.

A full mass carrier helps accomplish that, in conjunction with the optimum gas port size, action spring weight, and buffer weight.

If I was configuring a competition AR15 chambered in .223 Wylde with a RLGS or ILGS and I wanted my split times to come down, I would use the JP SCS with a JP Lo-Mass carrier and adjustable gas tuned to one or two specific loads for competition.

For 6.5 Grendel, I would feel better about a longer gas system length used in conjunction with a Low-Mass carrier and adjustable gas, but I would want adjustable gas on the carrier instead of up-front at the block. Right now, I'm unaware of any company making both a lightweight/lo-mass, adjustable gas carrier.
NRA Basic, Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, RSO

CCW, CQM, DM, Long Range Rifle Instructor

6.5 Grendel Reloading Handbooks & chamber brushes can be found here:

www.AR15buildbox.com
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Help me end my Low mass Vs full mass dilemma - by LRRPF52 - 03-25-2020, 11:30 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)