02-07-2020, 06:35 PM
stanc Wrote:I cannot imagine why you would disagree. What I said is verifiable fact, covered by Federal law.
As I said above, we will have to disagree. Federal law cannot invalidate a constitutional amendment's language. The people still have the right, regardless of what an individual state may have, or what federal law may say about National guard; the Constitution consistently differentiates between/among the federal government, the individual states, and the people. This has all been discussed before. This is my last statement on this as I do not intend to hijack the thread.
By the way, I Echo '55's question above:
"OK -- what Democrat Presidential candidate is more pro 2A and pro gun owner than Trump?"
I have expressed my vote for Trump but you have not expressed any alternative name. No names. No candidate.
What is your alternative named person or candidate? That is, I believe, the stated rules for this thread.
"Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"

