02-04-2020, 04:32 AM
and you immediately assumed...
A police officer sees a previous offender and is mandated not to discriminate.
A judge sees a previous offender but she/he can only convict if the facts present a case that is beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil case the burden of proof is less; on the balance of probabilities.
A hypothesis is not a conclusion (I am a scientist).
Don't spar with me on this, you have painted yourself into an intellectual corner. Assumptions are not facts.
A police officer sees a previous offender and is mandated not to discriminate.
A judge sees a previous offender but she/he can only convict if the facts present a case that is beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil case the burden of proof is less; on the balance of probabilities.
A hypothesis is not a conclusion (I am a scientist).
Don't spar with me on this, you have painted yourself into an intellectual corner. Assumptions are not facts.