stanc Wrote:Again you make a false accusation. I have never said that guns should be banned or heavily regulated. Nor did I say that incidents like this should be downplayed and dismissed.No you just keep repeating the anti-gun narrative, "that down plays CCH" while claiming to be pro gun. https://www.theblaze.com/news/columbine-...g%20NewsIn In the article, the writer said it's good that Wilson had a gun because he was qualified as a former sheriff's deputy and firearms instructor, but that the ability of other, potentially less-qualified gun owners to carry in church is cause for concern.
Quotes from you Stan:What I intended to say was: Unfortunately, this event fails to support "the idea that citizens are their own best defense."
I'm in no way trying to dissuade anyone from going armed. I'm merely noting that this event does not show what the OP and others claim.
Concealed carry parishioners did not neutralize the threat. An armed security guard did.
They were all armed security Stan, and were all parishioners. Yet your first response is too down play the citizens pro second Amendment aspect like the anti's in the articles I posted. As the first nation people would say, you speak with forked tongue.
stanc Wrote:Yes. I've addressed that at least twice.Like I stated, the logic of a battered wife!