02-27-2012, 10:19 PM
I've had discussions with others about the impact of shoulder angle and neck length on barrel life. Of the two, my intuition suggests that neck length is the more credible.
As a consequence, I would want to see a side-by-side comparison between the .260 and the Creedmore where they are both fed high-end fodder through the lifetimes of their barrels. For now, it seems the cost and availability of brass makes the .260 slightly more attractive.
As a consequence, I would want to see a side-by-side comparison between the .260 and the Creedmore where they are both fed high-end fodder through the lifetimes of their barrels. For now, it seems the cost and availability of brass makes the .260 slightly more attractive.