08-23-2019, 04:51 AM
Double Naught Spy Wrote:George Mason and many of the founding fathers had various opinions on what a militia should be, but that isn't necessarily what the country recognized as such.
The earliest federal legal definition I find in US law for 'militia' that is close to the time of the Constitution was the second Militia Act of 1792. It conscripted every "free able-bodied white male citizen" between the ages of 18 and 45 into a local militia company. It also required each to own a musket, bayonet and belt, two spare flints, a box able to contain not less than 24 suitable cartridges, and a knapsack: or a rifle, powder horn, ? pound of gunpowder, 20 rifle balls, a shot-pouch, etc., thereby taking away the right to keep and bear arms by making it a stipulation of conscripts.
In 1862, that was updated to include males of all races between the ages of 18 and 54. In 1903, the militia became the National Guard.
I have posted this before, but there is a difference between the organized and un-organised militia. The national guard is still under the Federal governments control.https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-10-ar...t-311.html

