08-22-2019, 07:23 AM
stanc Wrote:I never did like fishing, anyway.
Okay, maybe "disciple" was too strong, but it was a fair question, considering the similarities between you and AOC.
AOC would rather be "morally right" than factually correct. You would rather be "morally right" than factually correct.
AOC wants to infringe on the right to keep and bear arms. You want to infringe on the right to keep and bear arms.
Stan, I never once endorsed infringing on the right to bear arms, so knock it off. Requiring back ground checks and training such as required for concealed carry is not infringing on that right IMO. I believe," un-like you" it would fall under well regulated of the 2ndA. We have debated with out end on the meaning and intent of the 2ndA which we will never agree. I have always advocated that once a person was trained and past a back ground check, they should be able to purchase, own and carry any fire arm their hearts desired. There are people who should not own firearms, "whether you agree or not" and mandatory training with back ground checks is preferable to gun bans we already see in California and other places. I have never or will I ever endorse mandatory back ground checks on private firearm sales with the current system. This would become a de-facto gun registration, which I will never support. If the stats I posted are not correct, "then they should be exposed as false", but it was not done on purpose. I will take it up with Gary the next time I talk to him. As far as comparing me to a communist, piece of ...., nice try but no cigar!! Facts do matter Stan, but unfortunately, "emotion rather than logic sometimes does prevail,"which is the whole mental process of the democratic party and the Trump derangement syndrome effecting so many today.