2nd Amendment "rules" should apply to the 14th Amendment

[montana]

Good for you and your wife!..

Of course, training is very expensive. Who pays for all of these regular, professional, high speed, low drag training?.

Actually, it was my wife and daughter.
Who pays for the millions of automobiles, gas, insurance, maintenance, etc, going down the highway everyday?? If a person is serious about owning a firearm, they will have to cover the cost like every young person who enters hunter safety class. Instruction could be volunteer like in hunter safety. Tax deductions could be offered to ammo and firearm manufacturers for donations to help cover cost. Think of it as education, since that is exactly what it is. Of course we can do nothing and "enjoy shooting our flint lock rifles" we are mandated to keep at the shooting range.

So you are for infringement of our 2nd amendment rights.

No, "I'm for finding solutions to stop more infringements on our 2ndA rights" that are in the works right now. Do you have a better idea that you think will stop these proposed gun bans???

This sort of goes with the "more guns less crime" mantra of John Lott that was a complete fabrication based on misinterpretation of statistical data. People are stupid..

So you are a supporter of gun bans and believe armed and trained gun owners are no deterrent to crime????

That's really interesting. You like the idea of a showman being the spokesperson for dealing with crime and defensive training issues.

LOL, I stated : "I would rather have shooters like Jerry Miculek as my spokesman instead of some camouflage militia wanna be". My point was we as gun owners need to show the positive of our sport and hobby such as Gentleman Jerry with his modern sporting rifle. Perhaps you prefer the public pictures some camo covered dude threatening civil war or a disconnected crazy killing people with an assault weapon. Did Go Daddy show good looking female race car drivers in their adds or some alcoholic drunk drivers. This isn't that complicated!