No. You've taken enough away from us already.

[NugginFutz]

Stan, allow me to ask a question. Why the simple yet consistent and seemingly permanent tone in your posts here? I haven’t read everything, but I’ve read enough to see this is a forum you peruse and post in regularly. Are you attempting in a passive aggressive way to challenge the thoughts and encourage the improvement of the clarity of the writing of those that post here?

You can say whatever you wish, this is America. Last time I checked, the law was clear enough to protect that right.

I think most folks that take the bait are insulted by your tone, though that only seems to spur you on. While most of the time you’re technically correct, which is the only important part to you, there are times where your insinuations are rude at best.

We’re you picked on for being factually wrong at some point? Did/do you work for a legal think tank?

Say whatever you want about my post. It doesn’t bother me. What I find interesting is your continued insistence on throwing your weight into threads that are intended for discussion and wind up getting them closed or locked because they wind up becoming pointless and rude.

Be right. Win. But be alone in the end. It’s almost as though this is your goal. The fact is that in my mind these points you claim have nothing to do with the 2a, are in fact perfect examples of why I will always fight to keep them from revoking my right to keep and bear arms. Because they are illustrative of the mindset of those that want to take it from me; From us. And because of that listing them seemed a good way to pint out that I say no you can’t have my 2a for a reason.

You’re right, I don’t list in every sentence the way I believe they’re related. I think I kind of hoped the reader could connect those dots themselves. And I know for certain that you can. And did. And do.

Love ya man, keep the faith. Good night.

It sesms you’ve struck a nerve, kswt. He’s deleted all of his posts from the thread.